[中图分类号]F840.61 [文献标识码]A [文章编号]1004-3306(2020)05-0110-18 DOI:10.13497/j.cnki.is.2020.05.008
资源价格:30积分
[摘 要]实现受益公平性是基本医疗保障制度设计的重要原则。本文从公共服务均等化视角入手,以中国城乡基本医疗保险为基础,通过构建基本医疗保险受益公平性理论框架和两阶段Heckman模型,利用2009~2015年CHNS调查数据,对中国城乡居民基本医疗保险受益公平性进行分析。在未限制参保群体样本下,群体间受益差异显著。在模型中加入限制条件后的检验结果表明,不同收入群体在基本医疗保险受益公平性方面仍然存在显著差异,但系数水平降低。引入医疗保健补偿水平进行验证,结果呈现出低收入群体在医疗保健方面具有显著差异性,而这种差异性并未被商业医疗保险及社会医疗救助的补充作用所抵消,且医疗保健支出增多会降低个体住院等费用支出,而高收入群体具有更多的医疗保健支出,从而形成新的不公平。
[关键词]均等理念;受益公平性;社会医疗保险;医疗保健
[基金项目]本文系国家自然科学基金“长期护理社会保险的需求甄别、成本核算与筹资分担机制研究”(71904167)阶段性成果。
[作者简介]刘欢,浙江财经大学公共管理学院讲师,研究方向:养老保障与老龄经济学研究;戴卫东,浙江财经大学劳动与社会保障学科带头人、教授,研究方向:长期护理保险、养老保障等;向运华,武汉大学社会保障研究中心主任、教授,研究方向:养老保障和反贫困等。
The Fairness of the Basic Medical Insurance System for Urban and Rural Residents under the Concept of Equalization of Public Services
LIU Huan,DAI Wei-dong,XIANG Yun-hua
Abstract:An import principle of the basic medical insuarnce system is the equity and fairness of benefits.This paper started from the perspective of the equalization concept and was based on China′s urban and rural basic medical insurance system. It constructed the benefit fairness theoretical framework of the basic medical insurance and a two-stage Heckman model,using the data from the 2009-2015 CHNS survey,and analyzed the fairness of the benefits of the basic medical insurance in China. In case of samples of unrestricted insured groups,the benefits between groups are significantly different. After adding restrictions to the model,the test results still show significant differences in the fairness of basic medical insurance benefits among different income groups,but the coefficient level is reduced. Further verification by introducing the level of health care compensation shows that health care of low-income groups are significantly different,and this difference has not been offset by the complementary role of commercial medical insurance and social medical assistance. And the increase in health care expenditure will reduce individual hospitalization and other expenses,while high-income groups have higher health care expenditures,resulting in new inequities.
Key words:the concept of equalization;benefit fairness;social medical insurance;health care
《保险研究》20201201-《我国寿险公司治理效率评价的实证研究》(王稳、田满霞)
《保险研究》20201202-《健康风险、医疗保险与消费》(邵全权、郝天琪)
《保险研究》20201203-《长期护理保险的定价研究——基于XGboost算法及BP组合神经网络模型》(仇春涓、关惠琳、钱林义、王伟)
《保险研究》20201204-《特别重大事故影响个体风险偏好吗?——基于中国家庭金融调查的资产配置实证》(许荣、赵昶、常嘉路)
《保险研究》20201205-《用材林保险金额计算方法研究》(张德成、谢和生、马一博、朱洁净、范圣明、卜乐)
《保险研究》20201206-《边远地区农民享受金融服务的影响因素研究——基于新疆的微观调查数据》(杨新顺、雷汉云)